JLaporta has not stopped his dialectical battle against Real Madrid and Florentino Perez. After responding to what Real Madrid’s president described as “acute Barcelonaitis” in connection with the Negreira scandal, the Barcelona president used the club’s traditional Christmas dinner to endlessly attack his eternal rivals, saying: “They practice cynical and excessive arrogance. They have a crappy TV, from which they keep spouting lies and getting drunk.”
In this passage, the Blaugrana president admitted that he needed to soften his feelings “a little” about the situation: “This dimension that we have reached also gives rise to envy, which is managed very badly by people who take advantage of bad art and ignore all norms of behavior, not only sports, but also ethical and moral. I have to say, you know who I am referring to, the architects of the perpetual smear campaign against our shield and our essence. And we will not tolerate this. They are the same people who confuse power with unenlightened tyranny.”
Lamine Yamal coaches Pedri in a no-drop game during practice
family speech
At the Palau Blaugrana and in front of all the teams of the club’s professional section and their respective technical staff, Laporta spoke frankly about everything that has happened in the last few days of the exhibition match against Real Madrid and Florentino Perez. In his pre-Christmas speech, Laporta hinted at the upcoming elections and wanted to send an optimistic message for the future: “I hope to continue to be here next Christmas, celebrating Barça’s successes. Vizca El Barça and Vizca Catalunya.”
Laporta also harshly criticized Real Madrid’s new stance on the controversial Negreira incident in the interview with TVE, which was recorded in November last year. “In Madrid there is a sense of power, in Barcelona there is freedom. Their relationship with Florentino is fine. They want to prolong the Negreira process like chewing gum. Now they are suffering from chronic barcelitis. They We have explained it very well and we have presented evidence.”The court held that although there were reports that we had bribed referees, no one had presented evidence because that never happened. ”
